Some Sunderland fans continue to be perplexed as to why some players sit on the bench without playing. I become quite frustrated when I don’t comprehend things. I realize there’s probably a very valid explanation for whatever, but I need to know! My most recent question is concerning who is chosen to sit on the substitutes bench (or the warm padded seats, as they are probably today).
I don’t enjoy challenging a coach’s picks or formations because they work with the players every day. They understand their own talents, mental states, confidence levels, and how they best fit within a game strategy. We fans can only conjecture and act as armchair experts in the absence of genuine proof. I also hear that a younger player may be named to the matchday squad to acquire experience mingling with the first team and alleviate any initial worry or apprehension about playing with the “big boys” in front of thousands of fans, potentially for the first time. Even running down the touchline to warm up and hearing the ovation would be impressive for a youngster.
However, the subs bench is an important weapon for a manager, especially now that five substitutions are permitted. While it is beneficial for a young player to get experience, the bench should mostly consist of individuals who can influence a game, cover an injury, or provide an alternative option. This week, as usual, I’ve been consuming everything SAFC – articles, fan letters, and podcasts. Of course, The Roker Rapport is the best podcast, but others have mentioned the lack of depth we now have. What will the squad look like against Millwall?
When Milan Aleksić was discussed, the consensus was, “Well, obviously we can’t throw him straight into the fire,” or “He hasn’t had any minutes, so we won’t be able to call Aleksić.” This is where I become frustrated. Aleksić has appeared in 11 matches and served as a bench player this season. He has not played a single minute (except in the second half against Oxford). He hasn’t had much playing time with the Under-21s, either, having appeared only once.
So, why is he there? How many benches should he warm? However, this is neither a complaint against Aleksić or Régis Le Bris. It’s just that when I don’t comprehend anything, I become frustrated. I don’t believe the language barrier argument either. You can speak into your cell phone, and it will translate what you say into the language you prefer. So, what’s the story with the Serbian, who played 30 senior games for his team last season?
No doubt, the Millwall selection will be reviewed in the coming days as we decide who among the returning walking wounded can be slotted in where. I would want to see a couple minutes for Aleksić.
Leave a Reply